Phone 07814 624927
  Counsellor near Southampton
  • Home
    • Testimonials
  • Articles
  • Covid-19
  • Contact
    • Book Appointment
    • Counselling Students
07814624927​​
  • Home
    • Testimonials
  • Articles
  • Covid-19
  • Contact
    • Book Appointment
    • Counselling Students

Helpful Articles

Digging a little deeper

Calling time on political speak

30/6/2016

2 Comments

 
Big Ben representing British politics
With the recent events it is likely you will be hearing a great deal from our politicians over the coming weeks and months. Do you have that experience where you listen to a politician speak, and find you start nodding along, beginning to agree with what they are saying?

You may find it happens even with politicians whose views you are opposed to. And you may be wondering, how do they do that?

​Trading on Ambiguity


You may have noticed that politicians frequently use spin and soundbites when they talk. This is a fairly overt method of persuasion. While, many of us are used to spotting it, they also use a much more subtle method.

When we use a word to refer to something, say "tree", each of us will conjure up an image of a tree. Our images of trees may differ from person to person, however we will all pretty much agree whether the thing in front of us with branches and leaves on it, is a tree or not.

Politicans tend to use metaphorical language when they talk. The point about a metaphor is that the meaning is ambiguous in the way that "tree" is not. The meaning we take from a metaphor will each depend on our individual experience, so it will vary from person to person.

​Politicians rely on this ambiguity to persuade us. 

A recent excellent example of this comes from this snippet of Theresa May's leadership bid speech. footnote#1

The evidence of this need has been known to us for a long time. If you’re born poor, you will die on average nine years earlier than others. If you’re black, you’re treated more harshly by the criminal justice system than if you’re white. If you’re a white, working-class boy, you’re less likely than anybody else to go to university. If you’re at a state school, you’re less likely to reach the top professions than if you’re educated privately. If you’re a woman, you still earn less than a man. If you suffer from mental health problems, there’s too often not enough help to hand. If you’re young, you’ll find it harder than ever before to own your own home. These are all burning injustices, and - as I did with the misuse of stop and search and deaths in police custody and modern slavery - I am determined to fight against them.
 
source Theresa May 30th June 2016

​In the first few sentences Theresa sets up a theme of injustice, and gives a broad set of examples. Here in this section she is being specific. She is outlining the 'problem' so that she can give the solution - this is a very common advertising tactic.

Notice firstly that this is designed to provoke an emotion, and she also names it as injustice. Injustice is often experienced as a feeling of anger, and notice how she uses the metaphor 'burning' to ramp up this feeling.

She then delivers the solution - "I am determined to fight against them"

What she invokes here is a military metaphor. Notice the lack of detail. There is no who, what or how. And this is where the metaphor's ambiguity steps in. Because when you hear this phrase, you will automatically fill this missing bit in, based on your experience.

This will almost always involve an emotional response

What does fighting injustice mean to you? How do you feel thinking about injustice? Or thinking about fighting?

The metaphor 'fight against injustice' sounds like a good thing to do. After all, who would disagree with fighting injustice? However, without any detail we do not know what Theresa May means by this metaphor. It doesn't give us any substance about what she is committing to do if she becomes Prime Minister. 

So when she talks about fighting injustice, does that mean she is going to go on protest marches? Who is she going to fight? The corporations? Her own Chancellor when he sets a budget? Men? Universities? What is she going to fight them with? The military? The police? The courts?  ​

The other thing influential politicians do when they speak, is that they use emotional inflection in their voices. If you think about popular British leaders they have often displayed strong emotions. Margaret Thatcher often did, Tony Blair did, and so does Cameron. 

Theresa May also uses emotion in her leadership bid speech. The relevant section starts at 11:50


The first thing you will notice is there is a long pause before she starts this section. She slows down, and softens her voice tone, while she is talking. Listening, I hear her emoting sadness, and I intuit she is intending to convey empathy or sympathy. As she moves towards the "burning injustice" line she develops a harder and louder edge to her voice, which she continues through to the "determined to fight" line. 

Listening carefully her emotional tone appears to be affected rather than experienced. It doesn't quite match the content of her words. My sense in listening to her is that I am not sure she is fully connecting with the words she speaks. 

I was also surprised to hear her use sadness when talking about injustice, the most common response is anger, and this would have felt more natural. I would have had a stronger sense that she was connecting to what she was saying. 

The reality is that her speech would have been rehearsed, and so her initial emotional reaction to her words would become more muted as she practiced. Also there were some signs she was nervous making the speech, which can make connecting with what you are saying less natural and feel more forced. 

The reason that politicians use emotion when they speak, is because we connect with it. We will also experience an emotional reaction in response, and that is what politicians are aiming to achieve,

an emotional decision rather than a rational one

And we are all susceptible, even counsellors who spend many hours listening to people to talk!

How to decode political speak

Some suggestions for things you can do,
​
  • ​Read rather than listen to what is being said. This removes much of the emotional content, allowing you to more rationally appraise what is being offered.

  • Recognise when politicians are using metaphorical language. Politicians will frequently switch to metaphor at the end of something they are saying. This is almost invariably when they are saying what they will do about something.

  • Ask Who, What, How questions. This helps to make the metaphor more concrete, and enables you to appraise how realistic it is. "Making Britain Better" may sound great, but it doesn't really tell you anything.

Footnote #1

By using Theresa May's speech, I do not intend to imply any criticism of Theresa May, her policies, or actions in Government. My aim is solely to illustrate how politicians can influence us, and Theresa May's speech held a particularly good example. These strategies are used by all politicians from all political parties.

You may have noticed that my title, "Calling time on political speak," is also an example of what I am talking about. It's firstly a pun based on the image, secondly it's a metaphor. 'Calling time' is usually understood to mean ending something. Is that how I mean it? Clearly not. If you ask the 'who' and 'how' question, there is no way that I am able to 'call time' on how politicians speak. The second part is also a metaphorical reference. By calling something 'political speak' I have made how politicians talk in speeches an object or a thing. I have separated it from normal day to day talking as though it was somehow different, it isn't. Also you may notice that the title is ironic - I use 'political speak' to call an end to itself!

title photo by ​Unsplash
2 Comments
Frank Ninivaggi MD link
2/7/2016 08:47:00 pm

Again, Mark Redwood demonstrates his insight.
While I cannot comment with sufficient experience about British politics, I do know that his discussion about the nature of communication is on point.
As a therapist, myself, I often "listen" using my intuition/feelings/gut to the nonverbal transmissions of those speaking to me.
In some mysterious way, these get formed into clearer thoughts in my mind and I then realize that the person is using emotional appeals to make emotional points that may not align with reality.
I think it is true that professional politicians do this routinely.
Mark's advice brings this to sharp awareness and is a useful reminder.
Thank you ---Mark Redwood.

Reply
Mark Redwood
3/7/2016 08:50:41 am

Hi Frank, thanks for your kind feedback.

From watching US policiticians in action, they use very similar techniques. I think the main differences between the US and UK are really around style.

I think some of the differences in therapy are that people are not generally trying to create an impression, they want to be helped. What I notice is that people (including me!) will say something which does not seem to fit - like a trying to a jigsaw piece from a completely different puzzle. They are often bald statements - like Theresa's "fight them" statement. As a therapist I see my role as being curious about them, and opening them up... How do you fight? Who are you fighting? What are your weapons? Often transformations in meaning often appear out of these explorations.

regards

Mark

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Anger
    Anxiety
    Autism
    Bereavement
    Carl Rogers
    Change
    Children Young People
    Choice
    Counselling
    Creative Therapy
    Depression
    Ethics
    Gestalt Therapy
    Hope
    Identity
    Introject
    Mental Health
    Mindfulness
    Procrastination
    Relationships
    Stress
    Trauma
    Unconscious

    Archives

    November 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    September 2019
    April 2019
    October 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015

Mark Redwood Counselling

RSS Feed

Bio

I'm Mark, a Humanistic Counsellor.

“What’s one of those?” I hear you ask.

I have this fundamental belief we are all born with the potential for growth and the capacity to change. Sometimes along the way we can find ourselves stuck and can struggle to call on our own resources. 
​
​My goal is to seek the potential for growth, rather than trying to solve these problems directly. Once we discover our potential for growth, we also gain the capacity to solve our problems ourselves.

Mark Redwood Counselling
Home - Testimonials - Articles - Links - Contact - Book Appointment - Counselling Students - Privacy Policy - Terms

Mark Redwood, BA (Hons) Counselling, MBACP 

© Mark Redwood 2015, 2016.2017 | Main portrait by  Doug Freegard © 2015