Phone 07814 624927
  Counsellor near Southampton
  • Home
    • Testimonials
  • Articles
  • Covid-19
  • Contact
    • Book Appointment
    • Counselling Students
07814624927​​
  • Home
    • Testimonials
  • Articles
  • Covid-19
  • Contact
    • Book Appointment
    • Counselling Students

Helpful Articles

Digging a little deeper

Is anger really a problem?

8/2/2017

0 Comments

 
Angry young man
People frequently come to counselling with a problem, but what if what was ailing them wasn't a problem at all? What if your problem with anger was really a paradox?

This is the insight of David Bohm, a noted theoretical physicist of the late 20th Century. You can read his original essay "The Problem and The Paradox " here.

He argues that because we live in a technological society, we think about things as a problem, and then try to find a solution to that problem. However if what we are trying to solve is actually a paradox, then all that happens is confusion, which can make the 'problem' worse. #footnote 1

When I read David's piece it strongly resonated with me, because I often encounter paradox in the counselling room. And what I would like to do is take you through one of these paradoxes -  the 'problem' of anger 

Anger as a problem

When someone comes to me and says "I have a problem with my anger," what they often mean is that they have angry outbursts which are affecting their relationships.

The solution to this problem is usually, "I need to be calmer." Often the person has already tried very hard to be calmer, and they might even describe themselves as being, "Normally calm, and easy going."  

While you might think that someone who is calm, and easy going having angry outbursts is something of a paradox, the more paradoxical part is the act of trying to be calm, is making their anger worse.

Here's why

​We get angry in response to a threat of some kind, usually when our boundaries have been crossed, whether this intrusion is into our physical or emotional space. For instance if someone stands too close to you, or starts making unreasonable demands on you, anger gives you the energy to reassert this boundary. 

However, if you decide that the response in these situations is to be calm, then that anger has to be re-directed in some way. You might for instance deny you are angry, argue it away, ignore it, hold it in, or direct it at someone or something else.

By being calm, the original situation is never addressed. The person who crossed your boundary may never realise, and indeed may do it more. Eventually your ability to remain calm will fail, and you will have an angry outburst, followed by regret and a resolve to be calmer in future. And so the cycle starts over again.

You may be wondering if avoiding being angry, only leads to getting angrier, why people try to avoid being angry in the first place?

The paradox of anger

Because we are social animals, relationships are where we experience most threat, and hence the source of most of our anger. 

However, when we use anger in a relationship we encounter a paradox,

Responding to a threat in our relationships by getting angry creates a threat to those relationships - anger threatens the very thing we are trying to preserve. 

For example,
​
You have started seeing someone. You are hopeful the relationship will develop into something more. You have started to invest emotional energy, by daydreaming, and thinking about the person.

You are waiting for them to come, and they are late. They eventually arrive, after leaving you sitting in the restaurant alone for 30 minutes. They make a half-hearted apology and sit down. 

How do you respond?

Do you allow yourself to feel angry, to give you the energy to tackle them about the lateness, and risk they will storm out?

Or do you smile, make excuses for them, and tell yourself it doesn't really matter, all the while feeling resentful?
We very commonly take the second option, because this one carries the least risk of a sudden break in the relationship - i.e. you ensure that your date spends the evening with you.

However, your feeling of resentment is also a threat, because now you feel less committed to the relationship. 

The story may then develop something like this,
​
Although there are many good aspects to your relationship, you feel increasingly neglected. Eventually you decide you are going to do something about it.

Rather than addressing your feelings of resentment with your partner, you decide you are going to spend more time with friends. On one of these nights out, you end up getting drunk and sleeping with someone. 

You are left wondering how your life managed to get in such a mess. 
​
In this imaginary example, are the two features which David Bohm says happen when we treat a paradox as though it was a problem,
​
  • Confusion The person in the example has now complicated resentment with a betrayal. If they were going to seek help, which 'problem' would they focus on?
​
  • ​Makes things worse Embarrassment at being abandoned in a restaurant has turned into a much more destructive and damaging event.

The assumptions behind avoiding anger

And this brings us back to the beginning of the article. What is the problem you are trying solve?

It often looks something like this, 
​
You have learned relationships are harmed by conflict...
Relationships are in fact harmed by unresolved conflicts. Being able to successfully resolve conflict in a relationship will strengthen it.
​

Therefore to avoid conflict you must avoid responding to anger,
Which firstly prevents you from resolving the conflict, and secondly you can not avoid responding to anger, even if it gets turned into something else, such as a betrayal.

And to avoid responding to anger you must avoid feeling angry.
​Even if you manage to avoid being aware of your anger, by suppressing it, diverting it, or explaining it away, there is always a bodily response to anger - while you may not personally feel angry, your body most certainly will!

​Each of these is a problem solving step, and relies on a false assumption; leading you to believe that in order to have good relationships the 'solution' is to avoid feeling angry. 

When that solution doesn't work, rather than looking at how you framed the problem, the problem instead becomes trying to make the solution work better. 

So you seek help and say "I have a problem with my anger."

As your counsellor, if I also treated this as a problem to be solved, all I would succeed in doing is creating more confusion, and in all likelihood make things worse. 

Counselling for anger

Unlike a traditional anger management approach which tends to be structured, counselling is more fluid and responsive.

My approach contains 3 interwoven strands,
​
  • Increasing awareness of anger By being more aware of when you are angry, allows you to respond to the event which caused your anger.

  • ​Exploring ways of constructively responding to anger Having more possible choices of action allows you to feel more in control, and better able to deal with the situation.
​
  • Exploring ways of managing conflict in relationships Being better at resolving conflicts in relationships will help strengthen them.​

Resolving the paradox

When you experience a threat created by a relationship, trying to resolve it will always cause some kind of threat to the relationship.

The secret to resolving a paradox is to attend to both sides. You must attend to the threat to yourself and the threat to the relationship. It is an act of balance, not one of seeking a solution.

The counselling approach outlined above is an act of balance. It attends to your feelings of anger and it attends to how to manage this in your relationships.

Looking at anger this way, you can also see why assertive statements are useful. A basic assertive statement takes the form, 
​
When you do [X], I feel [Y]
 
The "when you " part of the statement uses neutral terms so that it only describes the action the person took. You avoid blaming words which suggest that their action was purposeful, such as ignored, made me, humiliated, rude, insulted. You then describe how you felt in response to their action. 

So in the restaurant example you might say,

When you turned up late, I felt really angry and let down.

By keeping the first part of the statement to description you reduce the chance the other person will feel the need to defend themselves, which may lead to them retaliating, dismissing, or deflecting blame. This attends to the threat to the relationship.

The second part of the statement accurately informs the other person how you felt. You are raising the other person's awareness of the impact their actions have on you. This attends to the threat to yourself.

With an assertive statement you can save it till later when you feel calmer, where it can be more effectively used. You can also signal that you are about to talk about something difficult by prefacing it with, "I want to talk about what happened earlier."

When using an assertive statement it is important to bear in mind they are not a magic formula. They still contain a threat to the relationship, and will always remain a balancing act.

There is no magic wand

Relationships are central to the existence of every Human Being. A warm, fulfilling relationship with another person is the one of the most complex and extraordinary things we will attempt.

Relationships contain every contradictory emotion we will ever experience. We can not avoid feeling anger in a relationship, just as we can not avoid breathing. 

What matters is not whether we feel angry, rather it is whether we use our anger destructively or creatively.
main photo by peter bierman via freeimages.com

Footnote #1 An even stranger paradox

David Bohm is actually highlighting the paradoxical nature of thought itself. By thought he is really talking about the entirety of our mental world, which is also composed of our interactions with others. So the thoughts in my head are not entirely my own, rather they are also part of a wider social system.

When I try to solve a problem I act as though somehow my thoughts were 'outside' myself, which is what we really mean when we talk about objectivity. Except of course my thoughts can never be 'outside' myself. So when I look at problems which involve thoughts, such as feeling angry, I have to carry out an act of self-deception. I have to pretend that my thinking about being angry is an entirely separate thing altogether. Except that this isn't possible, my thinking about my problem with anger is inextricably intertwined with my being angry.

Our western system of thought leads us to believe there is an 'outside' from where we can peer into our 'inside'. However, when we try to peer into the mirror of ourselves, it's not a true reflection we can see. What stares back is the imagination of our 'inside-self' showing us what we think we should see.

References

David J Bohm  The Problem and The Paradox  Birkbeck University
David J Bohm Biography Wikipedia

Would you like help with anger?

I am an experienced counsellor in private practice in the Southampton area of England, UK. I specialise in helping people to seek more constructive ways of dealing with angry feelings. 
Counselling with Mark

Related articles...

Coping with
Anger Part I
Coping with
​Anger Part II
Coping with
Anger Part III
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Anger
    Anxiety
    Autism
    Bereavement
    Carl Rogers
    Change
    Children Young People
    Choice
    Counselling
    Creative Therapy
    Depression
    Ethics
    Gestalt Therapy
    Hope
    Identity
    Introject
    Mental Health
    Mindfulness
    Procrastination
    Relationships
    Stress
    Trauma
    Unconscious

    Archives

    November 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    September 2019
    April 2019
    October 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015

Mark Redwood Counselling

RSS Feed

Bio

I'm Mark, a Humanistic Counsellor.

“What’s one of those?” I hear you ask.

I have this fundamental belief we are all born with the potential for growth and the capacity to change. Sometimes along the way we can find ourselves stuck and can struggle to call on our own resources. 
​
​My goal is to seek the potential for growth, rather than trying to solve these problems directly. Once we discover our potential for growth, we also gain the capacity to solve our problems ourselves.

Mark Redwood Counselling
Home - Testimonials - Articles - Links - Contact - Book Appointment - Counselling Students - Privacy Policy - Terms

Mark Redwood, BA (Hons) Counselling, MBACP 

© Mark Redwood 2015, 2016.2017 | Main portrait by  Doug Freegard © 2015